The International News Media Association (INMA), in partnership with Google News Initiative, recently introduced the updated version of its CMS Vendor Selection Tool. This tool now includes a refreshed list of CMS platforms that have been analyzed, serving as a useful starting point or an additional resource for selecting a CMS—though it should not be considered the sole source of information.
While this tool offers valuable insights, it does have certain shortcomings. For instance, some important CMS platforms are missing from the in-depth analyses and the selection criteria are not entirely clear. Additionally, it appears to be heavily focused on the English-speaking market and shows significant influence from WordPress (Automattic) and Google.
That said, it is still a solid source of information. The analyses have been conducted by an independent company with various checks, which adds credibility. However, it is always wise to consult other sources or even seek advice from experts like those at CMS MAG. In one specific case, we spoke to a newspaper that switched CMS platforms solely based on this tool, and the results were not favorable. It’s important to remember that a CMS alone isn’t everything—proper migration and careful evaluation of traffic sources (particularly Google) during the transition process are also critical.
The strongest aspect of this tool, which is both free and openly accessible, is its detailed analysis of various CMS platforms. It highlights their advantages and disadvantages, provides information about the companies behind them, and includes a useful list of features. This list outlines what each CMS offers natively and what requires external add-ons.
Note: Article originally written in Spanish, translated with ChatGPT, and reviewed in english by the author, Jorge Mediavilla.
Leave a Reply